<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Reason to Support a Financial Transaction Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.progressivefix.com/the-real-reason-to-support-a-financial-transaction-tax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.progressivefix.com/the-real-reason-to-support-a-financial-transaction-tax</link>
	<description>Progressive Fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Different Take on the Financial Transaction Tax &#124; Progressive Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivefix.com/the-real-reason-to-support-a-financial-transaction-tax/comment-page-1#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>A Different Take on the Financial Transaction Tax &#124; Progressive Fix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivefix.com/?p=1504#comment-401</guid>
		<description>[...] week, Lee Drutman argued in favor of an FTT, saying that a transaction tax modeled after the one our British friends have would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, Lee Drutman argued in favor of an FTT, saying that a transaction tax modeled after the one our British friends have would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall Street’s Bonus Problem &#124; Progressive Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivefix.com/the-real-reason-to-support-a-financial-transaction-tax/comment-page-1#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Wall Street’s Bonus Problem &#124; Progressive Fix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivefix.com/?p=1504#comment-297</guid>
		<description>[...] money out of the global economy through gouging and speculation (though, as I suggested in an earlier post, a financial transaction tax would make this more effective). But the important thing is that a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] money out of the global economy through gouging and speculation (though, as I suggested in an earlier post, a financial transaction tax would make this more effective). But the important thing is that a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman Klemick</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivefix.com/the-real-reason-to-support-a-financial-transaction-tax/comment-page-1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Herman Klemick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivefix.com/?p=1504#comment-236</guid>
		<description>I am all in favor of taxes on the arbitragers. The history of taxes and the present administrations support of wllstreat is that the taxes will end up on everyday citizens&#039; transactions such as credit card purchases, bank deposits, checks, etc. Why not tax the $30B in bonuses at 95%. It is simple and we do not need another burocratic agency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all in favor of taxes on the arbitragers. The history of taxes and the present administrations support of wllstreat is that the taxes will end up on everyday citizens&#8217; transactions such as credit card purchases, bank deposits, checks, etc. Why not tax the $30B in bonuses at 95%. It is simple and we do not need another burocratic agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
